Volume 1, No. 2 January 3, 2006
Inside
The Swine Industry
Commentary & Analysis on Today's
Pork Industry by Dr. Tom Stein
Top
Stories in 2005 -- Part 1
I thought I'd take a look at
the most important or most interesting stories or research that
came out in 2005 (IMHO), and some of the implications for 2006
and beyond.
I'm doing it as a series; this is "Part One." I
have more, especially on the production side. I don't know how
many parts I'll end up with, I'll just end when I'm
finished.
| Contents
1. Portfolio Approach to
Production 2. Producers Moving to Own the Processing Side
3. Genus (ABS) buys Sygen (PIC) 4. MetaMorphix,
Monsanto Join to Improve Pork Quality 5. Japan Opens Beef
Market to US 6. Not Much Expansion in the US Pork Industry
(At Least Not Yet) 7. December Report Makes Industry
Happy, Profits to Continue (For Awhile) 8. Pork Demand
Drops in 2005 9. US Pork Exports Grow in '05, May Slow in
'06 10. Production Efficiency Improves, Carcass Weights Go
Up 11. NC State Research Finds No Cost-Effective Manure
Alternative 12. Indiana Wants to Double Pork Production
13. Canadian Corn Duties 14. Precision Feeding
(Eco-Feeding) to Reduce Emissions, Mineral Excretion 15.
Animal Welfare Begins To Trump Production Efficiency
|
|
1. Portfolio Approach to
Production
It's very clear to me that the
industry is heading to what I thinkof as a "portfolio" type of
business structure. What I mean is that large-scale systems,
whether vertically integrated or coordinated, will end up with
a portfolio of different types of production flows. Some will
be commercial (commodity) pork production, some will be
"natural", some will be antibiotic-free, some will be designed
to produce "legacy" or "heritage" pork [see the articles I've
linked]. These flows are already happening within the
industry, but it looks to me like they will consolidate so
that individual companies will hold a mix of these
designated product-focused production systems.
The
question is what will be common across all types of production
systems. In other words, what are the common business
requirements no matter what type of production flow it is. My
guess is that environmental management systems, animal welfare
management systems, and precision feeding systems
(eco-friendly) will be common denominators rather
differentiators.
The biggest differentiators will
likely be genetics (as illustrated by the stories I've linked
to) and "natural" / "organic" systems (what-ever those
designations mean, i.e. antibiotic-free, truly organic, etc.).
Anything that focuses on taste and eating quality will be a
big winner (see Berkshire pork, for example).
Smithfield
Launches New, Fatter Pork Line PSF,
PIC Introduce Premium Legacy Sireline
|
|
2. Producers Moving to Own the Processing Side
Here's my prediction: Over the next __ years (not
sure, maybe 10? make your best guess), pork producers will end
up owning the kill-cut, product and packaging side of the
processing industry. The one big reason for this may surprise
you because it's not profit, it's information. Pork producers
may be able to add a little profit to the equation by owning
the kill-cut side, but what they really need is a clear path
to where the value is for their products. Typically, there are
two value matrices that packers work with: the first is the
packer buying grid, the one that's visible to producers. The
second is the packer selling grid, the one that packers use to
optimize their product mix. This one is not visible to
producers except in situations where producers own or are in a
joint-venture with packers. As an example, the best kill sheet
out there today is the one Meadowbrook Farms creates for their
producer-owners. There is no buying grid; as a producer-owner,
you see exactly where the value is for the cuts coming from
your hogs.
Triumph
Foods -- Pork Producers Pool Resources Second
Triumph Foods Pork Plant Approved Meadowbrook
Farms -- Producer-Owned Pork Processing Meadowbrook
Farms - Cooperative Advances... Olywest, A
Producer-Packer Joint Venture Olywest
Overview From Big Sky Farms
|
|
3. Genus (ABS) buys Sygen (PIC)
Genus bought
Sygen, the sale closed in early December. Cattle genetics
company (ABS) buys a pig and shrimp genetics company (PIC).
I'm not sure if this is a big story or not. I think it it is,
but mainly I chose it because it was a surprise. Here's what
Genus said about the benefits: (1) economies of scale,
particularly in the mature bovine and porcine markets, which
they expect to reduce costs; (2) reduce risk by reducing
dependency on one species (cattle); (3) combine R&D
programs and become a world leader in animal genetics research
(better chance of growing the total business; (4) benefit from
Sygen's experience in selling to food processors; (5) increase
efficiency and improve profitability and cash flow.
British
firm buys Sygen's operation
|
|
4. MetaMorphix, Monsanto Join to Improve Pork
Quality
In March, MetaMorphix, Inc. and Monsanto
announced a collaboration focused on applying genomic
technologies to provide genetic improvements in pork. Monsanto
Choice Genetics will use MetaMorphix’s GENIUS-Whole Genome
System in their marker-assisted pork improvement program.
Under the collaboration, MetaMorphix is providing Monsanto
with an exclusive royalty-bearing license to access
MetaMorphix’s porcine GENIUS-Whole Genome System, which
utilizes a map of approximately 600,000 SNPs, and the
associated intellectual property. In addition, MetaMorphix
will provide consulting and support in the use of its database
resource.
MetaMorphix is a company to watch. In 2002,
they acquired Celera’s animal genomics and genotyping
business, along with exclusive rights to sequenced genomes
in swine, cattle and poultry. Also in 2002, they did deals
with Cargill on the beef side (Caprock Feeders and Excel) to
identify markers for tenderness and quality as well as Wilmar
Poultry for turkey genomics.
www.metamorphixinc.com A whole-genome approach can unlock value
for pork industry Genomics will be raising the bar on pork
quality
|
|
6. Not Much Expansion in the US Pork Industry (At Least
Not Yet)
Despite dire predictions of an additional
200,000 to 300,000 sows being added to the US breeding herd
inventory in 2005, it didn't happen. Each time a new quarterly
Hogs & Pigs report was due to be released, there was much
wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth about the anticipated
expansion and subsequent drop in prices, but each time the
post-release stories said the same thing -- "producers
keeping a lid on expansion" -- in a surprised and
not-sure-what's-going-on-here-but-maybe-pork-producers-are-smaarter-than-we-think
sort of tone.
Producers Staying Disciplined on Expansion
(December '04 report analysis No
Move to Expansion Yet(March '05 report analysis) More
Pork in Next Year, but Lid Stays on Expansion (June '05
report analysis) Hogs & Pigs Report Analysis: Hints of
Expansion (September '05 report analysis)
|
|
7. December Report Makes Industry Happy, Profits to
Continue (For Awhile)
A string of 23 consecutive
months of profitable pork production should continue. "By and
large, the December report is very good news for hog farmers.
Producers will maintain the profitable run in 2006, although
it may be with tighter margins", says Ron Plain, University of
Missouri.
Hogs
Pigs Report archive Ron Plain
& Glenn Grimes Hogs & Pigs Analysis
|
|
8. Pork Demand Drops in 2005
"Both the beef
and pork sectors are going to have to wake up to lower
domestic demand trends," notes James Minert, Extension
economist at Kansas State University. He points to
third-quarter 2005 domestic pork demand, showing a 8 percent
to 9 percent drop from 2004 levels. "I think we'll see the
fourth-quarter demand numbers reflect that too."
Domestic
Pork Demand at a Breaking Point? (Pork magazine)
|
------------------------------------------------------------- Learn
More About i-Production
Next-generation software for
running pork systems. Customers from the smallest
independents to the largest integrated systems.
Seven (7) of the Top 20 US pork producers. Tracking
500,000 sows, 4 million nursery pigs, 5 million finishing
pigs, and 4.5 million carcasses. Growing numbers each
month.
Discover what some of the smartest
producers already know. Call or email to schedule a demo:
Sara Clark /
651-905-7436
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
9. US Pork Exports Grow in '05, May Slow in '06
Plain and Grimes: "The brightest picture for the hog
industry continues to be exports. In the January-October
period pork exports were up 23.4% from 2004, and 2004 growth
was 27%above the 2003 level. 2005 is the 14th consecutive year
with record high exports. We expect pork exports to
increase again in 2006 but believe the odds are high that the
growth will be substantially less than in 2004-05.
Click to read
their analysis... Pork
producers celebrate Mexican market
|
|
10. Production Efficiency Improves, Carcass Weights Go
Up
Production efficiency as measured by pigs
weaned per litter and litters/sow/year continued it's
inexorable increase in 2005. We can continue to expect these
year-over-year increases in litter size, driven mainly by
genetic improvement. LSY improvements eventually will drop off
as the industry completes its consolidation to large-scale
production systems. Although we don't have published benchmark
data for throughput (YET), I'm sure that throughput as
measured by pigs per farrowing space per year or weight
sold/sow/year continued to increase as well. Carcass
weights went up again and will keep going up as long as feed
cost remains low and packers don't change their grids to
increase discounts on heavier hogs.
|
|
11. NC State Research Finds No Cost-Effective Manure
Alternative
Under an agreement with the
state, North Carolina State University researchers were
to identify waste handling alternatives to lagoons and
pits. Smithfield Foods, Inc. and Premium Standard Farms Inc.,
parties to the agreement, were to switch to the new disposal
system within three years, if it was affordable. (Key words!)
With the help of $17.3 million from the pork
producers, researchers identified five alternatives. But
none of the systems appear to be financially viable, according
to Mike Williams, NC State ag engineer and project head.
Here's where it gets interesting...
"An
economic advisory panel that Williams has consulted during the
research deadlocked on a definition of feasible. The panel
eventually gave Williams one report written by the majority of
its members and another by pork producers. The majority of the
panel endorsed the idea that farmers should accept at least
some increased cost, even if it meant decreasing the number of
hogs in the state by 12 percent. But the farmers decided
economic feasibility means no increased cost of doing
business."
This story will be very interesting to
watch in 2006. Look for some very tough politics, fighting and
negotiation. It has huge implications for the rest of the
industry because it will set precedent and you can bet other
states are paying close attention. I don't see producers
winning on this one.
Manure-technology
Studies Near Completion NC State
Report on Alternative Manure Technology Hog
waste debate goes on N.C.
hog farmers see new waste treatments as too costly The
latest poop on handling hog waste isn't encouraging Costs
should not prevent them from being used
|
|
12. Indiana Wants to Double Pork Production
Kudos to the state of Indiana (Governor Mitch Daniels
and Ag Sec'y Becky Skillman, in particular) for making a bold
move and highlighting economic development associated with
agriculture and specifically growing the pork industry. The
most important part of this story will be the staying power in
the face of critics and advocates trying to block "industrial"
farming. See the link on "Conservation or Commodities" to get
a flavor for the debate. And this is a real debate, not with
crazies but with the Izaak Walton league.
An
interesting snippet from that article...
"It is simply
the case," he said [referring to a spokesperson for the Izaak
Walton League], "that the increased commodity production or
'arms race' being waged among state ag departments -- Iowa vs.
Minnesota vs. Kansas vs. Indiana and so forth -- hinges on one
fact: grain has to be cheap for any of the uses, ssuch as
feeding hogs, distilling ethanol or making soy bio-diesel, to
be profitable."
Arms race among state ag departments?
Hadn't heard that before.
By the way, congrats on a
big step forward.... Natural Pork Production II recently got
approval to build an 11,200-sow operation in Williamsburg,
Indiana.
Indiana
Agricultue's Strategic Plan Indiana
Ag's Economic Development Summit (presentations) Conservation
or commodities? Farm debate continues County
Closer to Zoning Changes Study: Pork Industry Key to
Indiana Economy
|
|
15. Animal Welfare Begins To Trump Production
Efficiency
I am slightly famous (at least I think
I may be, er...maybe not) for a statement I made 7 or 8 years
ago that "health trumps genetics." The idea was that the
production paradigm had switched; the change to modern genetic
lines basically was complete across the industry but health
problems were keeping producers from fully realizing genetic
value, and even more importantly, health problems were causing
serious business risk. So the key decision threshold became
health as opposed to genetics, and companies like PIC were
caught a little flat-footed at the time. Most genetics
companies recognized that and moved as quickly as biology
allows to a more higher-health pyramid.
Well, it's
clear to me that animal welfare is moving right into that same
role. Welfare will trump straight economics on production
system design. Producers will fight this but at the end of the
day welfare will win.
AVMA
Statement on Pregnant Sow Housing Sow
Stalls vs. Pens A
Clash Over Sow Stalls AVMA
Revises "Pregnant Sow" Housing Policy AASV
releases official position on swine welfare Delegates
Endorse Swine Animal Welfare Program
|
| _______________________________________________
Inside the Swine Industry is
brought to you as a FREE service by MetaFarms. At
MetaFarms, our big deal is building and delivering
next-generation Web-based software for running pork
production systems. We call it i-Production.
To learn more about our company, go to www.metafarms.com.
To learn more about our software, go to i-Production.
|
|
|